<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nathan R. Hale - minister of music • composer • free culture advocate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanrhale.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanrhale.com</link>
	<description>singer/songwriter • composer • free software advocate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:45:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s New iTablet, No&#8230; iSlate, No&#8230;iPad? by nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/27/its-apples-new-itablet-no-islate-no-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=521#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Thanks for reading and commenting! You bring up some really good points.  I agree that Flash is horrible. I am hoping for and more open standard for video as HTML 5 gets adopted, one that actually works works well! ;) That said, to get the &quot;best&quot; internet experience (if you want to stream any commercial video - news, hulu, etc) you pretty much have to use flash. Otherwise you&#039;re done. This may change in the future but makes it pretty difficult for many people to really think of the iPad as truly excellent for web browsing.

I also agree that Apple is great at user-experience. They know how to make stuff become a pleasure to use. But-crazy as this sounds-I could not give this my grandmother because she enjoys lots of flash video from  major content producers as well as flash animation e-cards, etc. The iPad just couldn&#039;t fulfill her needs. Same for my wife...she has an Asus netbook running Ubuntu though, and loves it. It has a full keyboard, and completely rich Internet experience, but weighs less than 2lbs and fits in her purse.

I certainly think there is is niche that the iPad is perfect for, and that niche will broaden as the product and technology becomes even more mature...maybe (hopefully!) bringing larger-scale touch-screen computing to the mainstream. We saw this kind of progression with the iPod and iPhone. I am glad Apple introduced this product, and I am looking forward to where it will lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and commenting! You bring up some really good points.  I agree that Flash is horrible. I am hoping for and more open standard for video as HTML 5 gets adopted, one that actually works works well! ;) That said, to get the &#8220;best&#8221; internet experience (if you want to stream any commercial video &#8211; news, hulu, etc) you pretty much have to use flash. Otherwise you&#8217;re done. This may change in the future but makes it pretty difficult for many people to really think of the iPad as truly excellent for web browsing.</p>
<p>I also agree that Apple is great at user-experience. They know how to make stuff become a pleasure to use. But-crazy as this sounds-I could not give this my grandmother because she enjoys lots of flash video from  major content producers as well as flash animation e-cards, etc. The iPad just couldn&#8217;t fulfill her needs. Same for my wife&#8230;she has an Asus netbook running Ubuntu though, and loves it. It has a full keyboard, and completely rich Internet experience, but weighs less than 2lbs and fits in her purse.</p>
<p>I certainly think there is is niche that the iPad is perfect for, and that niche will broaden as the product and technology becomes even more mature&#8230;maybe (hopefully!) bringing larger-scale touch-screen computing to the mainstream. We saw this kind of progression with the iPod and iPhone. I am glad Apple introduced this product, and I am looking forward to where it will lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Screenshot for Week of February 1, 2009 by ScottW</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/02/01/screenshot-for-week-of-february-1-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=514#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>I like this one Nathan. Simple yet awesome. (I suck at good descriptive analysis):)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this one Nathan. Simple yet awesome. (I suck at good descriptive analysis):)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s New iTablet, No&#8230; iSlate, No&#8230;iPad? by Scott</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/27/its-apples-new-itablet-no-islate-no-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=521#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I had similar thoughts about the iPad at first, but truthfully, I&#039;ve come to hate flash. Adobe blames Apple for its poor performance on OS X, but I don&#039;t know or care, I just know it&#039;s a pig. Even on windows (when I have to use it), the only times I get browser crashes in FF or Safari for windows, it&#039;s because of Flash.  Waiting for something in Flash to load makes the whole computer unusable.

The thing about Apple is that they make stuff eminently usable.  Sure, the app store and other aspects have people crying &quot;control freaks,&quot; but the truth is that for their target audience with devices like the iPad, stability and performance trump huge feature lists and hackability. Honestly, my parents don&#039;t care about hackability, nor do I for those times I would be using one in place of a laptop or desktop machine.

I share Apple&#039;s distaste for netbooks, which is odd because my employer is big into them. But truly, they provide a wretched user experience. I&#039;d rather tote my 15&quot; macbook pro around than use a netbook for a minute. YMMV.

I think that the applications and whatever content deals Apple comes up with will make the difference. Apple makes devices that are not overly feature laden, but do certain things very well. Then they slowly add more and more functionality. This is nothing new to people who&#039;ve been using Apple products for years and years.

I don&#039;t think it will be a flop. I think at a minimum, it will do quite well. I think in a year&#039;s time, the iPad will be something that I could give my mom in lieu of her Windows laptop, and she&#039;d be perfectly content with it.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I had similar thoughts about the iPad at first, but truthfully, I&#8217;ve come to hate flash. Adobe blames Apple for its poor performance on OS X, but I don&#8217;t know or care, I just know it&#8217;s a pig. Even on windows (when I have to use it), the only times I get browser crashes in FF or Safari for windows, it&#8217;s because of Flash.  Waiting for something in Flash to load makes the whole computer unusable.</p>
<p>The thing about Apple is that they make stuff eminently usable.  Sure, the app store and other aspects have people crying &#8220;control freaks,&#8221; but the truth is that for their target audience with devices like the iPad, stability and performance trump huge feature lists and hackability. Honestly, my parents don&#8217;t care about hackability, nor do I for those times I would be using one in place of a laptop or desktop machine.</p>
<p>I share Apple&#8217;s distaste for netbooks, which is odd because my employer is big into them. But truly, they provide a wretched user experience. I&#8217;d rather tote my 15&#8243; macbook pro around than use a netbook for a minute. YMMV.</p>
<p>I think that the applications and whatever content deals Apple comes up with will make the difference. Apple makes devices that are not overly feature laden, but do certain things very well. Then they slowly add more and more functionality. This is nothing new to people who&#8217;ve been using Apple products for years and years.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it will be a flop. I think at a minimum, it will do quite well. I think in a year&#8217;s time, the iPad will be something that I could give my mom in lieu of her Windows laptop, and she&#8217;d be perfectly content with it.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s New iTablet, No&#8230; iSlate, No&#8230;iPad? by nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/27/its-apples-new-itablet-no-islate-no-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=521#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Haha I&#039;ve seen that vid. Awesome. Sent you link to another vid on Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha I&#8217;ve seen that vid. Awesome. Sent you link to another vid on Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s New iTablet, No&#8230; iSlate, No&#8230;iPad? by Matt Ashton</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/27/its-apples-new-itablet-no-islate-no-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=521#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>Ipad? That has to be the worst name they could have chosen. This is almost like the Mac Book Wheel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuVbrm_GqhM I mean, c&#039;mon, this is just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ipad? That has to be the worst name they could have chosen. This is almost like the Mac Book Wheel. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuVbrm_GqhM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuVbrm_GqhM</a> I mean, c&#8217;mon, this is just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Screenshot for Week of January 25, 2010 by ScottW</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/26/screenshot-for-week-of-january-25-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=497#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Sounds good to me Nathan. My daughter is doing a photo a day for 365 days and is enjoying it so far. Nice desktop background too btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good to me Nathan. My daughter is doing a photo a day for 365 days and is enjoying it so far. Nice desktop background too btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Install Firefox 3.6 on Ubuntu in 3 Easy Steps by Links 22/1/2010: Sun to be &#8216;Merged&#8217;, Linux 2.6.33 Reaches RC5 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/21/install-firefox-3-6-on-ubuntu-in-3-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 22/1/2010: Sun to be &#8216;Merged&#8217;, Linux 2.6.33 Reaches RC5 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=485#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>[...] Install Firefox 3.6 on Ubuntu in 3 Easy Steps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Install Firefox 3.6 on Ubuntu in 3 Easy Steps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gedit Makes a Great Minimal Note Taker by nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/20/gedit-makes-a-great-minimal-note-taker/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=469#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean cherax...makes sense. Right now I&#039;m handling via subfolders in my &quot;Notes&quot; folder full of txt files. But I only have one subfolder, &quot;Archive.&quot; I think my notetaking needs (now that I&#039;m pretty much done with school) are pretty minimal.

Still, I&#039;m gonna check out Gjots2. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean cherax&#8230;makes sense. Right now I&#8217;m handling via subfolders in my &#8220;Notes&#8221; folder full of txt files. But I only have one subfolder, &#8220;Archive.&#8221; I think my notetaking needs (now that I&#8217;m pretty much done with school) are pretty minimal.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m gonna check out Gjots2. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gedit Makes a Great Minimal Note Taker by cherax</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/20/gedit-makes-a-great-minimal-note-taker/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>cherax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=469#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was referring to nesting in the file list, not within a particular document. If I have a project that contains a bunch of text files, then several text editors (jEdit, e.g.) have the ability to display that file list, but it&#039;s flat - i.e. no sub-topics. That&#039;s not really any different than having a tab for each document. In contrast, an organizer like Notecase (or Tuxcards, or gjots2) allows sub-topics and sub-sub-topics, all of which can be nested into a tree-like structure. Clicking on any one of the tree entries then opens that entry in the editing field. The problem is that you have to use the text-editing function of the organizer program. Gjots2 organizes topics into a tree structure, but still lets me use my preferred text editor; best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was referring to nesting in the file list, not within a particular document. If I have a project that contains a bunch of text files, then several text editors (jEdit, e.g.) have the ability to display that file list, but it&#8217;s flat &#8211; i.e. no sub-topics. That&#8217;s not really any different than having a tab for each document. In contrast, an organizer like Notecase (or Tuxcards, or gjots2) allows sub-topics and sub-sub-topics, all of which can be nested into a tree-like structure. Clicking on any one of the tree entries then opens that entry in the editing field. The problem is that you have to use the text-editing function of the organizer program. Gjots2 organizes topics into a tree structure, but still lets me use my preferred text editor; best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Install Firefox 3.6 on Ubuntu in 3 Easy Steps by nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathanrhale.com/2010/01/21/install-firefox-3-6-on-ubuntu-in-3-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanrhale.com/?p=485#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>Bummer! The ppa is a daily one, so I&#039;m updating consistently...nothing&#039;s broke for me yet *finger&#039;s crossed*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer! The ppa is a daily one, so I&#8217;m updating consistently&#8230;nothing&#8217;s broke for me yet *finger&#8217;s crossed*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
